No saved questions yet — write them in Active recall below and they appear here tomorrow.
The in-block blurting already happened during the 90. This is the spaced pass: yesterday's questions, aloud then typed. Below 100 sends you to the exact source.
Send one message, or queue one, for the June advice round: a short, specific ask to someone a step ahead. Mark it when it's sent or scheduled.
How to take notes, learn each topic, and lock it in — the same loop every day, with recall built into the 90 minutes.
Your own running list. Add one as you meet it; it stays for reference.
Every answer you grade on the Today page lands here \u2014 the prompt, the grade, your delivery, and the recording. Open any saved answer to record a fresh take and grade it; the new attempt overrides the old.
What it is. The operating profit a property throws off — the property-level, unlevered measure of profitability. Real estate's version of operating income.
The chain: PGI (rent at 100% market occupancy) → less vacancy & credit losses → EGI → less direct opex → NOI. It is unlevered (before financing) and pre-tax, which is what makes it comparable across properties regardless of how each is financed.
Excludes: depreciation, interest/mortgage, income taxes, corporate SG&A, capex. Includes as opex: property taxes, insurance, management fee, maintenance, utilities.
Worked example. Take a 200-unit apartment building. At full market occupancy it would bill $16M a year — the potential gross income. But some units sit empty and a few tenants don’t pay, knocking off $0.8M, so you actually collect $15.2M (effective gross income). Running the place — taxes, insurance, the management fee, repairs, utilities — costs $10.2M, leaving $5.0M of NOI. Notice the mortgage is nowhere in that math: two investors could buy this same building with completely different loans and it would still throw off $5.0M, which is exactly why NOI is the number everyone compares on.
GAAP status. Non-GAAP, not a required line. Used because GAAP net income is muddied by depreciation, financing, and taxes — and because it's non-GAAP, definitions vary, so confirm what's in the opex line before comparing two properties.
What it is. Two cousins at different levels. NOI is the operating profit of a single property; EBITDA is the operating profit of a whole company. Both strip out financing, taxes, and non-cash items — but they sit one level apart.
The key gap: NOI does not subtract corporate SG&A (head-office overhead); EBITDA does. Both exclude interest, taxes, and D&A.
Worked example. Picture a small REIT that owns five apartment buildings. Each runs its own P&L, and together they produce $25M of NOI. But the REIT also has a head office — executives, accountants, the cost of being public — that runs $4M and isn’t charged to any single building. Subtract that corporate overhead and you’re at about $21M of EBITDA. So NOI is what the bricks earn; EBITDA is what the company earns after you pay the people running it.
What it is. The expected unlevered yield on a property — annual NOI per dollar of value. "For each $1 of price, how much NOI does it produce?" A return measure, and therefore a risk measure.
Intuition. The cap rate is the inverse of a valuation multiple — an inverse EV/EBITDA. A 5% cap = a 20x multiple; a 10% cap = a 10x multiple. Low cap = high multiple = expensive = lower risk. High cap = cheap = higher risk. Use stabilized NOI in the numerator.
Range. ~5%–10% in CRE by type/class/market. Property types ranked highest → lowest cap: hotel → retail → office → industrial → multifamily (riskiest to safest).
Worked examples. Say a stabilized building produces $100k of NOI and trades for $2M — that’s a 5% cap, meaning each dollar of price buys you 5 cents of annual income. Flip it: if the market pays a 6% cap for similar assets and your building earns $12M of NOI, it’s worth about $200M. The move interviewers want is the multiple translation — a 5% cap is the same as paying 20x income and a 10% cap is 10x, so a “low” cap isn’t cheap, it’s expensive.
What it is. The cap rate at the moment you buy — the year-1 expected yield on your entry cost.
Intuition. Same formula as the cap rate, measured at acquisition using forward/stabilized NOI. A higher going-in cap means a cheaper entry — more income per dollar in. For ground-up development the denominator is total project cost and it's then called yield on cost (§21).
Worked example. You’re buying a recently stabilized property for $28.1M all-in (price plus closing costs and a little day-one capex), and in year one it should earn $2.8M of NOI — a 10% going-in cap, the yield you step into on day one. Pay $40M for that exact same $2.8M of income and your going-in cap drops to 7%: you’re handing over more for the same dollars, betting on future growth to bail you out. The going-in cap is really just the cap rate frozen at the moment you sign.
What it is. The cap rate assumed at sale, used to price the reversion (the resale value at the end of the hold).
Convention. Set the exit cap higher than the entry cap — roughly +10 bps per year of hold — to stay conservative: the asset is older and rates may have risen. Higher exit cap = lower assumed sale price = safer return math. It is the single most powerful assumption in a hold model.
Worked example. Imagine you’ll sell in year five and the building’s forward NOI at that point is $625k. Apply a 5.5% exit cap and the sale price is about $11.4M; nudge the exit cap to 6.0% — same building, same income — and it falls to $10.4M. That ~$0.9M swing from half a point is why the exit cap is the assumption everyone fights over: you changed nothing about the property, only what a future buyer demands, and a million dollars of value moved.
What it is. The estimated open-market price a property would sell for, set by supply and demand. Triangulated from three appraisal methods, used together because each has a weakness.
Value = Stabilized NOI ÷ Market Cap Rate. The cap rate rearranged (§3) — most used in CRE.Land + (Cost New − Accumulated Depreciation). Substitution principle — never pay more than the cost to build an equivalent. Used when comps are thin.Worked example (income). A stabilized office building earns $1.14M of NOI. The income approach at an 8% market cap values it at $14.25M; if caps compress to 6%, that same income is suddenly worth $19M. A broker might also pull recent sales of comparable buildings around $250/SF (sales comparison), and an appraiser might peg the cost to rebuild it new, less depreciation, at $13M (cost approach). You triangulate — for an income property you lean on the income number, but the other two keep you honest.
What it is. The levered cousin of the cap rate — annual pre-tax cash flow per dollar of equity invested, after financing.
Intuition. Where the cap rate ignores debt (NOI ÷ value), cash-on-cash is post-financing. With positive leverage (cost of debt < cap rate), cash-on-cash > cap rate; with negative leverage it's lower.
Worked example. Buy a $1M property at a 5% cap, so it earns $50k of NOI. You borrow 60% ($600k) at a 5% rate, costing $30k a year in debt service, and put in $400k of your own equity. After paying the bank you keep $20k, and $20k on $400k is a 5% cash-on-cash. Here it equals the cap rate only because your borrowing cost matches the cap — the instant debt gets cheaper than the cap rate, leverage starts working for you and the cash-on-cash climbs above 5%.
What it is. The annualized, time-weighted return on your equity over the whole hold, accounting for the timing of every cash flow. The headline RE return metric.
Levered vs unlevered. Unlevered IRR runs off NOI and total cost; levered IRR runs off equity cash flows after debt. With positive leverage, debt amplifies IRR — and the downside.
Worked example. You put $400k of equity into a deal, collect about $20k a year in cash flow, and sell in year five for $650k of net proceeds after paying off the loan. String those together — $400k out today, small checks each year, a big check at the end — and the IRR is roughly 14%. The concept to hold onto: IRR cares intensely about timing. That same $650k arriving in year three instead of year five would push the IRR up sharply, even though you got back the identical dollars.
What it is. Total cash returned per dollar of equity invested — "how many times my money back," ignoring time.
Intuition. 1.0x = break-even; 2.0x = doubled. It says nothing about how long it took — that's IRR's job. A high IRR with a low multiple (quick flip, small dollars) and a low IRR with a high multiple (long hold, big dollars) are both common.
Worked example. Put in $1M, collect $400k of distributions along the way, and walk away with $1.6M at sale — $2.0M back on $1M in, a 2.0x equity multiple. But 2.0x says nothing about speed: earn it in three years and that’s a sparkling ~26% IRR; drag it out over ten years and the same 2.0x is a sleepy ~7%. That’s why nobody quotes a multiple without the hold period attached — the multiple is the size of the win, the IRR is how fast it came.
What it is. The layered ordering of all capital funding a deal, ranked by repayment priority and risk/return.
Two directions. Cash flows and sale proceeds pay from the bottom up (senior first); losses are absorbed from the top down (common equity wiped first). Higher in the stack = paid later = more risk = higher required return.
Worked example. A $100M deal might be funded with $60M of senior debt at 5%, $15M of mezzanine at 10%, $10M of preferred equity at 9%, and $15M of common equity. Now suppose it sells for only $90M — a $10M loss. The common equity eats that first, dropping from $15M to $5M, while the senior, mezz, and pref are all paid in full. That’s the whole idea: the cheap money sits safely at the bottom and gets paid first, and the common equity on top earns the most upside precisely because it absorbs the first loss.
What it is. Leverage measured against value — how much of the property is debt-financed.
Intuition. Lenders cap LTV (~60–75%, lower for riskier assets) to keep an equity cushion beneath their loan. Higher LTV = more leverage = higher returns and higher wipeout risk.
Worked example. A building worth $10M with a $6.5M loan is at 65% LTV, leaving $3.5M of equity beneath the bank. That cushion means values would have to fall more than 35% before the loan is underwater. Push the loan to $8M (80% LTV) and your returns get juiced — but now a 20% dip in value wipes the lender’s margin, which is exactly why lenders cap LTV and why high leverage cuts both ways.
What it is. The cushion between the property's income and its debt payments — can NOI cover the mortgage?
Intuition. 1.0x = NOI exactly covers debt (no cushion); 1.25x = NOI is 25% above the payment. Lenders require ≥1.20–1.25x (more for riskier assets); below 1.0x the property can't self-fund its debt.
Worked example. A property earns $1.0M of NOI and owes $800k a year in mortgage payments — a 1.25x DSCR, so income covers the debt with 25% to spare. If the lender insists on a 1.30x minimum, the most debt service they’ll allow is $1.0M ÷ 1.30 = $769k, which sizes a smaller loan. The concept: DSCR is the lender asking “if income dips, does this thing still pay its mortgage?” — the bigger the cushion, the more comfortable they are lending.
What it is. The lender's pure return if it had to take the property back today — independent of rate, amortization, and the (subjective) appraised value.
Why lenders use it. LTV depends on a gameable appraisal and DSCR is flattered by low rates; debt yield strips both out — it's just NOI per dollar lent. In tight credit it's often the binding constraint.
Worked example. A lender looks at a property with $1.0M of NOI and a requested $12.5M loan: that’s an 8% debt yield, the return they’d earn if they had to foreclose and run the building tomorrow. They don’t care that low rates make the DSCR look healthy or that a generous appraisal flatters the LTV — debt yield strips both out. If they require a 9% minimum, the most they’ll lend is $1.0M ÷ 9% = $11.1M, full stop.
What it is. The contractual rules dividing distributable cash between LPs (investors/capital) and the GP (sponsor/operator), in priority tiers tied to return hurdles.
Key terms. Pref = LP-first preferred return; promote/carry = the GP's outsized share of upside; hurdle = the IRR breakpoint; catch-up = GP making up ground after the pref.
Worked example. An LP puts in $10M with an 8% preferred return and an 80/20 promote above it, and the deal returns $14M. First the LP gets its $10M back, then its 8% pref off the top; only after that does the remaining profit split — 80% to the LP, 20% to the GP. That 20% slice is the promote, the GP’s reward for clearing the hurdle. The point interviewers test: the GP eats last and earns nothing until the LP gets its pref, but it earns disproportionately once the deal outperforms.
What it is. The same metric as the exit cap — the cap applied to the year-after-exit NOI to estimate the resale price in a hold model. Synonyms: reversion cap, exit cap.
Convention. Set it at or above the going-in cap (~+10 bps/yr) to reflect an older asset and uncertainty. Because it prices the reversion, it often drives more than half of total return in a 5-year hold.
Worked example. You plan to hold five years and sell in year six, when NOI should be $700k. Apply a 6.0% terminal cap and the building sells for about $11.67M — and in a typical five-year hold, that single reversion figure is often more than half your total profit. That’s why a conservative model sets the terminal cap a touch above the entry cap: you’re assuming the next buyer is a little more cautious than you were.
What it is. The risk premium investors demand for owning property instead of the risk-free asset.
Intuition. Property is riskier and far less liquid than Treasuries, so it must yield more; the spread is that compensation. Historically ~200–400 bps — it widens in stress and compresses in booms.
Worked example. A building trades at a 6% cap while the 10-year Treasury yields 4% — a 200 bps spread, your reward for taking on illiquid, riskier real estate instead of a government bond. Now say rates jump to 5% but cap rates are slow to move and stay at 6%; the spread compresses to 100 bps, and real estate suddenly looks expensive next to just buying Treasuries. Watching that spread is how investors judge whether property is cheap or rich versus the risk-free alternative.
What it is. The link between financing costs / risk-free rates and property cap rates — and therefore values.
Direction. Over time, higher rates → higher caps → lower values, because debt is costlier (buyers pay less) and the risk-free alternative yields more. But not 1:1: the cap spread (§16) absorbs part of the move, and strong NOI growth or heavy capital inflows can hold caps down even as rates rise.
Worked example. A building earns $1M of NOI and trades at a 5% cap, so it’s worth $20M. Rates climb, buyers demand more yield, and cap rates drift up to 6% — now the same $1M of income is worth only $16.7M, a 17% haircut with not a dollar of change in the building’s performance. That’s the macro risk in one number: you can run the asset perfectly and still lose money if the market re-prices yield.
What it is. Cap rates falling over a hold → values rising, with NOI unchanged.
Driver. Less perceived risk — falling rates, strong demand, an improving submarket, more capital chasing deals. Compression is "free" return, not earned from operations.
Worked example. Buy at a 6% cap with $1M of NOI and you’ve paid $16.7M. Hold it, do nothing operationally, and sell into a hotter market at a 5% cap — that same $1M of income now fetches $20M, a $3.3M gain handed to you by the market. It’s real money, but it isn’t skill, which is why conservative underwriting refuses to count on it: the market can just as easily move the other way.
What it is. Cap rates rising over a hold → values falling, NOI unchanged. The inverse of compression and the conservative assumption.
Driver. More perceived risk — rising rates, weakening demand, supply glut.
Worked example. Buy at a 5% cap ($1M NOI → $20M), then get caught selling into a weaker market at a 6% cap — the same income is now worth only $16.7M, a $3.3M loss with flat NOI. Layer leverage on top and it turns ugly: if values fall through your equity cushion, expansion is how a perfectly-run deal still wipes out. This is the downside that padding the exit cap is meant to protect against.
What it is. The same property seen unlevered (cap rate) vs levered (cash-on-cash). Cap rate = NOI ÷ value (ignores debt) — the comparison tool across properties. Cash-on-cash = (NOI − debt service) ÷ equity — your actual first-year yield on the cash you put in.
Worked example. Take the same $1M property at a 5% cap ($50k NOI) with 60% leverage and $400k of equity. If your debt costs 5%, you pay $30k and keep $20k — a 5% cash-on-cash, identical to the cap. Drop the debt cost to 4% and you keep $26k, lifting cash-on-cash to 6.5% (positive leverage — debt cheaper than the cap). Raise it to 7% and you keep only $8k, sinking to 2% (negative leverage). Same building, same cap rate — leverage was the only thing that moved your equity yield, and it only helped when the loan was cheaper than the cap.
What it is. The going-in yield measured on your all-in cost rather than on price — the cap rate's development / value-add cousin.
Intuition. You create value when your yield on cost exceeds the market cap rate you can exit at — "build to a 7, sell at a 5."
Worked example. You spend $28M all-in to build and stabilize a property that ends up earning $2.0M of NOI — a 7.1% yield on cost. If the market buys stabilized assets like it at a 5.5% cap, that $2.0M of income is worth $36.4M, so you’ve manufactured roughly $8.4M of value out of the gap between what it cost you to create the income and what the market pays for it. “Build to a 7, sell at a 5” is that gap in shorthand.
What it is. The premium of your yield on cost over the market exit cap — the compensation for taking development / lease-up risk.
Rule of thumb. Target ≥150–200 bps; below that, the risk isn't worth it versus simply buying a stabilized asset.
Worked example. Your yield on cost pencils to 7% and the market exit cap is 5% — a 200 bps development spread, your pay for taking construction and lease-up risk. On $28M of cost that translates to an exit value near $39M and roughly $11M of profit. The lesson is that the absolute yield is meaningless on its own: a 7% yield on cost is fantastic against a 5% exit cap and a waste of risk against a 7% exit cap, because then you could have just bought the building already finished.
What it is. Yield on cost specifically for ground-up development.
Worked example. A ground-up project totals $50M once you add land, hard construction costs, architect and permit fees, and the interest carried during construction. Stabilized, it earns $3.5M of NOI — a 7.0% development yield, which against a 5.25% exit cap is a 175 bps spread. The trap is forgetting the soft costs and the construction-period financing; leave those out and the yield looks artificially high, and the deal looks better than it really is.
What it is. NOI generated per dollar of total cost — the same family as yield on cost, often used interchangeably.
Nuance. Some shops use "return on cost" for value-add (existing asset + renovation) and "development yield" for ground-up — but the math is the same: NOI over everything you put in.
Worked example. You buy a tired building for $20M and spend $5M renovating it, so you’re all-in at $25M, and the upgrades push stabilized NOI to $1.75M — a 7% return on cost. Compare that to the going-in cap you’d have paid for the same building already fixed up, maybe 5.5%, and the 150 bps of extra yield is your compensation for doing the work. It’s the same idea as yield on cost, just framed around an existing asset plus its renovation budget.
What it is. A synonym for cash-on-cash — the cash yield the equity earns in a given year, framed like a stock's dividend yield.
Worked example. A property kicks off $20k of cash flow after debt service in a year, and you have $400k of equity in it — a 5% equity dividend rate, the cash “dividend” your equity earned that year. It’s the exact same number as cash-on-cash, just dressed in stock language. And like a stock’s dividend yield, it’s a snapshot of one year’s cash, not the lifetime return.
What it is. How long until cumulative cash flow returns your initial equity — a liquidity / recovery-risk gauge.
Intuition. Shorter payback = capital back sooner = less exposure. It ignores everything after payback and, in simple form, ignores time value.
Worked example. You put in $400k of equity and the property throws off $80k a year, so on simple math you’ve recovered your money in five years. That’s a quick read on how long your capital is exposed — but it’s deliberately blind to everything after year five, including the large check you’d collect at sale. A deal can have a “slow” payback and still be excellent once the exit is counted, which is why payback is a sanity check, never the verdict.
What it is. Valuing a property as a multiple of its income — the dominant CRE method.
Intuition. It is the cap rate rearranged — the market cap rate converts income into value. Direct cap uses one stabilized year; the DCF variant projects several years plus a reversion and discounts them.
Worked example. An office building stabilizes at $1.14M of NOI. Capitalize it at the market’s 8% cap and it’s worth $14.25M; if caps tighten to 6%, that same income is worth $19M. This is the workhorse method in commercial real estate because it values a building for exactly what it is — an income stream — and the cap rate is just the market’s quoted price for a dollar of that income.
What it is. The single-period form of the income approach — capitalize one stabilized year's NOI into a value.
Vs DCF. Direct cap uses one normalized year and a cap rate — simple, and standard for stabilized assets. A DCF projects multiple years of NOI plus a reversion and discounts them — needed when cash flows are lumpy or growing.
Worked example. Take one clean, stabilized year of NOI — say $1.0M — and divide by a 6.25% cap rate to get a $16M value. That’s direct capitalization: one representative year, one cap rate, done. It works beautifully when income is steady, but if the building has a lease-up or a big tenant rolling, a single year doesn’t represent it well and you’d switch to a multi-year DCF instead.
What it is. Valuing a property as the cost to replace it — land plus building cost, minus depreciation.
Principle of substitution. A rational buyer won't pay more than the cost to build an equivalent substitute. Best for special-purpose properties (schools, churches), brand-new construction, or thin-comp markets.
Worked example. An appraiser values a property at $3M for the land plus $20M to rebuild the structure new, then knocks off $4M for wear and age — landing at $19M. The logic is substitution: no rational buyer pays more than it would cost to go build the same thing. It shines for a school or a brand-new building with no good comps, but it says nothing about how much income the property earns, so for an investment property it’s a cross-check rather than the main event.
What it is. The projected stabilized value of a property once planned renovations are complete — the target value in value-add and fix-and-flip.
Worked example. You’re eyeing a fixer that, once renovated, should be worth $500k — its after-repair value — and the work will cost $80k. The flipper’s 70% rule says don’t pay more than 70% of ARV minus repairs: (0.70 × $500k) − $80k = $270k, leaving a margin for carrying costs and profit. The whole deal lives or dies on that ARV estimate — get the finished value or the repair budget wrong and the cushion vanishes.
What it is. The price a willing, informed buyer and seller — neither compelled — would agree on in an open market with reasonable marketing time.
How it's derived. The triangulation of the three approaches (income, sales comps, cost), weighted toward whichever fits the asset. Distinct from investment value, which is to a specific buyer with specific financing or strategy and can exceed FMV.
Worked example. Your three methods come back at $14M (income), $14.5M (comps), and $13.5M (cost), so fair market value is around $14M for an income property where you’d weight the income read. FMV assumes a willing buyer and a willing seller, both informed and neither under pressure, with normal time to market. That last part matters: a distressed owner dumping the building in a week might take $11M, but that’s a fire-sale price, not fair market value.
What it is. Operating efficiency — how much of a property's revenue survives as NOI.
Intuition. Higher margin = leaner operations / lower expense ratio. It varies by type: multifamily high (~55–65%), office moderate, hotels low (labor- and operations-heavy). A low margin can flag value-add upside (room to cut opex).
Worked example. A well-run apartment building collects $8.5M and keeps $5.0M as NOI — a 59% margin, typical for multifamily. An opex-heavy asset, by contrast, might collect $15.2M and keep only $5.0M, a 33% margin. A margin that’s low for its property type is a flag: it often means bloated expenses you could trim, which is exactly the upside a value-add buyer hunts for.
What it is. Projected next-twelve-month (or stabilized) NOI — versus trailing (T-12) NOI.
Why it matters. Buyers price on where income is going, not where it's been — especially with lease-up, mark-to-market rents, or contractual escalators.
Worked example. A building’s trailing-twelve-month NOI is $1.8M, but leases already signed and contractual rent bumps mean the next twelve months should bring $2.0M. On a $40M price the trailing cap looks like 4.5% while the forward cap is a healthier 5.0% — and the forward number is what a buyer actually underwrites, because they own the future income, not the past. The gap between trailing and forward is the growth you’re paying for.
What it is. The NOI a property produces once it reaches normalized, market-level occupancy and rents — after lease-up, renovation, or repositioning is done.
Why it matters. Pre-stabilization NOI is artificially low (vacancy, concessions, construction drag); valuation and cap rates must use the stabilized figure to be meaningful.
Worked example. A property mid-lease-up is only earning $1.2M today because part of the building is still empty and offering concessions. Once it fills to 93% at market rents, it’ll earn $2.0M — and that $2.0M is the number you value it on, not the depressed current figure. Capitalizing the $1.2M would badly undervalue it; the whole point of “stabilized” is to value the asset for what it becomes, not the transitional moment you caught it in.
What it is. NOI as a percentage of a base — which is the cap rate or the yield on cost, depending on the denominator.
Intuition. The same "income per dollar" idea; only the base changes — market value vs your cost.
Worked example. The same $2.0M of NOI looks different depending on what you divide it by. Against your $28M all-in cost it’s a 7.1% yield on cost; against the $36M the market would value it at, it’s a 5.6% cap rate. The fact those two numbers differ is the value you created — you built income more cheaply than the market prices it — which is why “NOI yield” is meaningless until someone tells you the base.
What it is. The gap between market rent and the lower in-place (actual) rent — upside locked in until leases roll.
Intuition. It's embedded NOI growth — as below-market leases expire and reset to market, NOI rises with no operational change. Value-add buyers hunt for it.
Worked example. A 100-unit building rents at $1,400 a month while comparable units fetch $1,600 — that $200 gap across 100 units over twelve months is $240k of loss to lease, income you’re not yet collecting. It isn’t lost forever: as those below-market leases expire and reset to market, NOI climbs $240k with zero operational change, which is exactly the embedded upside a value-add buyer pays for. The catch is it only shows up if market rents hold, and only as leases actually roll.
What it is. The annual return a property earns from rent, gross or net.
Intuition. Net rental yield is essentially the cap rate (NOI ÷ price); gross is a quicker, cruder screen that ignores opex and vacancy.
Worked example. A house rents for $120k a year, costs $40k to operate, and is priced at $1.6M. The net rental yield — $80k over $1.6M — is 5%, essentially the cap rate; the gross version ignores that $40k of expenses and shows a flattering 7.5%. The difference between those two numbers is just the expense load, which is why a “yield” quoted gross can be wildly misleading.
What it is. A fast screening yield using gross rent and price, ignoring all expenses and vacancy.
Use. A first-pass filter (common in residential) to rank assets before deeper underwriting. It overstates the real return because opex and vacancy can be 30–45% of gross.
Worked example. A property pulls $120k of rent and is listed at $1.5M — an 8% gross rental yield, a tidy number for a first-pass screen. But once you subtract operating costs and vacancy, which can easily run 30–45% of gross, the real yield (the cap rate) might be closer to 5%. Gross yield is fine for quickly sorting a list of properties and dangerous as the basis for an actual decision.
What it is. Price as a multiple of gross rent — a quick comp tool and the inverse of the gross rental yield.
Intuition. Like a revenue multiple for property; it ignores opex, so it's only valid comparing similar-expense assets.
Worked example. A building priced at $1.0M collects $100k of gross rent — a 10x gross rent multiplier. A nearly identical building down the street at 8x is cheaper per dollar of rent and worth a closer look. But because GRM never touches expenses, it only means something when you’re comparing properties with similar cost structures — a 10x building with a leaky roof and a 10x building with new systems are not the same buy.
What it is. Price as a multiple of effective gross income (rent net of vacancy, plus other income) — a slightly truer cousin of the GRM.
Vs GRM. GRM uses gross potential rent; GIM uses EGI, so it captures occupancy better — but it still ignores operating expenses.
Worked example. Take a $1.0M property whose effective gross income — rent after vacancy, plus laundry and parking income — is $115k, and you get an 8.7x gross income multiplier. It’s a slightly sharper screen than the GRM because it accounts for occupancy and other income, but it still ignores operating expenses entirely, so it’s a step toward the real picture, not the real picture.
What it is. Price as a multiple of NOI — which is exactly the inverse of the cap rate.
Intuition. The only rent multiple built on NET income, so it's the "real" one — a 5% cap is a 20x NIM, a 10% cap is a 10x NIM.
Worked example. A building selling for $20M on $1.0M of NOI carries a 20x net income multiplier — and because it’s built on NOI, that 20x is exactly the inverse of a 5% cap rate. This is the one multiple that uses net income rather than gross rent, which makes it the honest cousin of the GRM and GIM and the cleanest bridge between how real estate talks (yields) and how the rest of finance talks (multiples).
What it is. A Real Estate Investment Trust — a company that owns (or finances) income-producing real estate and passes its income to shareholders, with special tax treatment.
Types. Equity REITs own property and earn rent (most REITs); mortgage REITs own mortgages/MBS and earn an interest spread; hybrids do both. They give liquid, daily-priced, diversified real estate exposure without buying buildings directly.
Worked example. A REIT with $500M of taxable income has to pay out at least 90% of it — $450M — as dividends to keep its tax-free status at the corporate level. That single rule shapes everything: REITs are income machines that hand cash straight to shareholders, but because they can’t retain much, they have to keep tapping public markets to fund growth. In exchange you get liquid, daily-priced exposure to a whole portfolio of buildings without ever signing a mortgage.
What it is. The REIT industry's earnings metric, correcting GAAP net income for real estate's huge non-cash depreciation.
Why. GAAP depreciates buildings heavily, crushing reported net income even though well-kept real estate often holds or gains value — so net income understates a REIT's earning power. Adding back RE D&A (and removing one-time sale gains) gives a truer recurring number, the "EPS of REITs."
Worked example. A REIT reports $200M of GAAP net income, but that figure was dragged down by $150M of non-cash real estate depreciation — even though its well-maintained buildings haven’t actually lost value. Add that depreciation back and strip out a one-time $20M gain from selling a building, and you get $330M of FFO, a far truer read on recurring earnings. That’s why the whole REIT world quotes FFO per share, not EPS — GAAP earnings understate a business whose biggest “expense” is a paper one.
What it is. FFO refined toward true distributable cash, by subtracting the capital a REIT must spend to keep its properties competitive.
Why. FFO ignores the real, recurring capex needed to maintain buildings and smooths contractual rent bumps (straight-lining). AFFO strips those out to approximate the cash actually available for dividends.
Worked example. Start from that $330M of FFO, then get honest about the cash the REIT actually has to spend: roughly $40M a year keeping buildings competitive (recurring capex) and a $10M adjustment for straight-lined rent that hasn’t arrived as cash. Take those out and you’re at $280M of AFFO — the cash genuinely available to pay dividends. FFO is the headline earnings number; AFFO is the one that tells you whether the dividend is real.
What it is. The cash yield a REIT's shares offer to equity — AFFO per share over price.
Intuition. The public-market cousin of cash-on-cash — the recurring cash the business generates per dollar of share price. Compare it to the dividend yield: if the dividend is covered, AFFO yield ≥ dividend yield.
Worked example. A REIT generates $4.00 of AFFO per share and trades at $50 — an 8% AFFO yield, the recurring cash the business throws off for every dollar of stock price, the public-market echo of cash-on-cash. Hold it next to the dividend yield: if the stock pays a 9% dividend but earns only 8% of AFFO, the dividend isn’t covered by cash and is living on borrowed time — a classic red flag.
What it is. The REIT valuation multiple — price per share over FFO per share, the "P/E of REITs."
Why FFO, not EPS. GAAP EPS is distorted by depreciation, so P/E misleads for REITs; FFO normalizes earnings, making P/FFO the comparable multiple.
Worked example. A REIT at $50 a share earning $5.00 of FFO per share trades at 10x P/FFO — the REIT version of a P/E. A peer at 13x is richer, maybe deservedly if it’s growing faster or owns better assets. You use FFO instead of EPS because GAAP earnings are mangled by depreciation, so a normal P/E would make every REIT look absurdly expensive; comparing P/FFO within a sector is how you tell rich from cheap.
What it is. The methods to value a REIT — primarily Net Asset Value, plus the dividend discount model and FFO multiples.
Intuition. NAV marks the REIT's buildings to market (capitalizing NOI at market cap rates), nets out debt, and divides by shares — REITs then trade at a premium or discount to NAV. P/FFO (§46) cross-checks on a relative basis.
Worked example. To get a REIT’s NAV, you mark its buildings to market — capitalize the portfolio’s $300M of NOI at a 6% market cap rate for $5.0B of asset value — subtract $2.0B of debt, and divide the $3.0B of equity by 100M shares for a $30 NAV per share. If the stock trades at $27, it’s at a 10% discount to the value of its bricks, telling you the market is more pessimistic than the appraised assets imply. The whole estimate hinges on that assumed cap rate, so a small move in it swings NAV a lot.
The highest-frequency questions, with the one-line answer each wants. Practice these out loud in the Behavioral tab and work the math in Calculation practice.
How a real estate private equity shop is organized and what each seat does.
What it is. Assets = Liabilities + Stockholders’ Equity. It holds after every single transaction, which is why a balance sheet “balances.” Equity expands into the pieces that actually move it:
Intuition. The left side is everything the company owns; the right side is who has a claim on it — lenders first (liabilities), owners second (equity). Every transaction has a dual effect: it touches at least two accounts and keeps the two sides equal. If you only see one side move, you’ve missed the other.
Worked example. A founder puts $50,000 of cash into a new company for stock. Cash (an asset) rises $50,000 and common stock (equity) rises $50,000 — both sides up by the same amount, still balanced. The next day the company borrows $20,000: cash +$20,000 and notes payable (a liability) +$20,000. Then it buys a $15,000 truck for cash: one asset (truck) up $15,000, another asset (cash) down $15,000 — the equation never wobbles because the change stays inside the asset side.
What it is. Four reports, prepared in a fixed order because each feeds the next:
Intuition. The income statement and cash flow statement cover a span of time (a quarter, a year); the balance sheet is a photograph at the closing instant. They’re stitched together: net income drops into retained earnings, ending retained earnings lands on the balance sheet, and the ending cash from the cash flow statement is the cash line on that same balance sheet.
Worked example. A company earns $300k of net income and pays $50k of dividends. Net income flows to the retained-earnings statement: beginning RE $1,000k + $300k − $50k = $1,250k ending RE, which becomes the retained-earnings line on the balance sheet. Meanwhile the cash flow statement starts from that same $300k, adjusts it to cash, and produces an ending cash figure — say $420k — that is exactly the cash asset shown on the balance sheet. Two statements, one number each, both feeding the snapshot.
What it is. Debit = the left side of an account, credit = the right side. In every entry, total debits equal total credits.
Intuition. “Debit” does not mean “decrease.” Each account has a normal side — the side that increases it. Cash is an asset (debit-normal), so debits grow it and credits shrink it. A loan is a liability (credit-normal), so credits grow it. The reason debits always equal credits is the equation: every transaction keeps both sides of A = L + SE in step.
Worked example. A company collects $50,000 cash by issuing stock. Cash is an asset that goes up, so you debit it; common stock is equity that goes up, so you credit it: Dr Cash 50,000 / Cr Common Stock 50,000. Later it pays $8,000 of rent: rent expense goes up (debit, because expenses are debit-normal) and cash goes down (credit): Dr Rent Expense 8,000 / Cr Cash 8,000. Notice the same account, cash, is credited to decrease it here and was debited to increase it before.
What it is. A journal entry records a transaction as offsetting debits and credits; posting those to T-accounts builds the ledger balances that become the financial statements.
Intuition. Think of the journal as the diary (transactions in time order) and the T-accounts as the filing cabinet (every transaction sorted by account). The exam tests the diary; the statements come from the cabinet. A split entry — part cash, part on account — still has to balance, you just have more than one line on one side.
Worked example. A company buys $1,000,000 of machinery for cash: Dr Equipment 1,000,000 / Cr Cash 1,000,000. Later it buys $1,800,000 of inventory but only pays $1,000,000 in cash, owing the rest: Dr Inventory 1,800,000 / Cr Cash 1,000,000 / Cr Accounts Payable 800,000. Both balance — the second just splits the credit across two accounts because the company paid part now and promised part later.
What it is. Recognize revenue when the performance obligation is satisfied — when the good or service is delivered — not necessarily when cash changes hands.
Intuition. Revenue is earned by doing the work, not by getting paid. Cash and revenue are two separate events that happen to coincide sometimes. This single principle is why the cash flow statement and adjusting entries even exist — they reconcile the timing gap between earning and collecting.
Worked example. Last year a company collected $600,000 cash in advance for 1,000 phones and recorded it as unearned revenue, a liability, because nothing had been delivered. This January it ships the phones. Now the obligation is satisfied, so it moves the liability into revenue and records the cost: Dr Unearned Revenue 600,000 / Cr Sales Revenue 600,000 and Dr COGS 200,000 / Cr Inventory 200,000. No cash moves this year — the cash arrived last year — yet this is when the $600,000 of revenue belongs.
What it is. Record expenses in the same period as the revenues they help generate, regardless of when cash is paid.
Intuition. Profit only means something if the costs of earning revenue sit in the same period as that revenue. So the cost of a product (COGS) hits the income statement when the product is sold, not when it was bought; the cost of a machine is spread (depreciation) over the years it helps produce. Matching is the reason a company can pay cash in one period and recognize the expense in another.
Worked example. A retailer buys $200,000 of inventory in March and pays cash then, but sells it in June. Under matching, no expense hits March — the $200,000 sits as an inventory asset. In June, when the sale (and its revenue) is recognized, the $200,000 becomes cost of goods sold. Same logic with a $1,000,000 machine bought in March with a four-year life: instead of a $1,000,000 expense in March, you record $250,000 of depreciation a year, matching the cost to each year the machine earns revenue.
What it is. Accrual accounting (required by GAAP) records revenue when earned and expenses when incurred. Cash basis records only when cash moves.
Intuition. Accrual gives a truer picture of performance because it ignores the accident of when cash happens to arrive. The price you pay is that net income no longer equals the change in cash — and that gap is exactly what the cash flow statement and the four adjusting entries reconcile. Cash basis is simpler but can hide a business that’s booking sales it hasn’t collected or skipping bills it hasn’t paid.
Worked example. A consulting firm finishes a $40,000 project in December but won’t be paid until January. On accrual, December shows $40,000 of revenue and a $40,000 receivable — the work was done, so the revenue belongs there. On cash basis, December shows nothing and January shows $40,000. The accrual version tells you the firm earned $40,000 in December; the cash version tells you only when the money landed.
What it is. At period end you adjust accounts so the statements show what was actually earned and incurred. There are exactly four, and every one touches one income-statement account and one balance-sheet account — never cash.
Intuition. Two questions sort every adjustment. First: has the cash already moved? If yes it’s a deferral (you’re moving a balance you parked earlier into revenue or expense); if no it’s an accrual (you’re recording something earned or incurred before the cash). Second: is it revenue or expense? Those two answers point you straight at one of the four entries. Cash is never in any of them — the cash event already happened or hasn’t yet.
Worked example. At December 31 a company has: a machine bought in March that needs depreciation (prepaid-type deferral of a long-lived cost) — Dr Depreciation Expense / Cr Accumulated Depreciation; six months of insurance paid in October, three months now used (prepaid deferral) — Dr Insurance Expense / Cr Prepaid Insurance; and interest owed on a loan but not yet paid (accrued expense) — Dr Interest Expense / Cr Interest Payable. Three different situations, each landing on exactly one of the four patterns, none touching cash.
What it is. Cash received before you deliver is a liability; as you earn it, you move it into revenue.
Intuition. When a customer prepays, you owe them the product — that obligation is a liability, not income. The liability shrinks and revenue appears only as you do the work. The classic case is a subscription: collect a year up front, then recognize one-twelfth each month.
Worked example. On June 11 a company receives $1,200,000 in advance to deliver 2,000 phones. It records Dr Cash 1,200,000 / Cr Unearned Revenue 1,200,000 — a liability, because nothing is delivered. If by year-end it has shipped half, it earns $600,000: Dr Unearned Revenue 600,000 / Cr Sales Revenue 600,000, leaving $600,000 still sitting as a liability for the phones it still owes.
What it is. Cash paid in advance is an asset; as it gets used up, you expense it.
Intuition. Paying ahead buys you a future benefit — that future benefit is an asset. The asset is consumed over time, and each chunk consumed becomes an expense. At any balance-sheet date, the prepaid asset that remains equals the unused future benefit.
Worked example. On October 1 a company pays $1,000,000 for six months of insurance, so $166,667 of coverage per month. By December 31, three months have been used. The adjusting entry expenses those three months: Dr Insurance Expense 500,000 / Cr Prepaid Insurance 500,000. The income statement now carries $500,000 of insurance expense, and the balance sheet still shows $500,000 of prepaid insurance — the three months of coverage not yet used.
What it is. Expenses incurred but not yet paid — interest, wages, taxes — recorded now with a payable.
Intuition. The cost was incurred this period — you used the borrowed money, your employees worked — so the expense belongs here even though you’ll pay later. The credit creates a liability that records what you still owe. When you eventually pay, you settle the payable, not record a new expense.
Worked example. On October 1 a company takes a $500,000 loan at 16% annual interest. By December 31, three months have passed: $500,000 × 16% × 3/12 = $20,000 of interest has been incurred but, say, not yet paid. The adjustment is Dr Interest Expense 20,000 / Cr Interest Payable 20,000. The income statement now reflects the cost of borrowing for the quarter, and the balance sheet shows the $20,000 still owed.
What it is. Revenue earned but not yet billed or collected — record a receivable now.
Intuition. The mirror image of an accrued expense. You did the work or earned the interest, so the revenue belongs this period even though no invoice has gone out or no cash has come in. The debit creates an asset — the right to collect.
Worked example. A company has lent money and earned $8,000 of interest by December 31 but won’t receive it until next year. The work — lending — is done, so the revenue is this year’s: Dr Interest Receivable 8,000 / Cr Interest Revenue 8,000. Net income rises $8,000 and a new asset, interest receivable, appears, even though no cash has moved.
What it is. Temporary accounts (revenues, expenses, dividends) close to retained earnings at period end so they restart at zero; permanent accounts (assets, liabilities, equity) carry their balances forward.
Intuition. Revenue and expense accounts measure one period’s performance, so they have to be emptied before the next period starts — their net (net income) gets swept into retained earnings, and dividends are swept out of it. The balance-sheet accounts persist because a building you own at year-end is still yours on January 1.
Worked example. A company finishes the year with $600,000 of revenue, $900,000 of expenses, and $50,000 of dividends. Closing the revenue credits RE $600,000; closing the expenses debits RE $900,000; closing dividends debits RE $50,000. Net effect on retained earnings: $600,000 − $900,000 − $50,000 = a $350,000 decrease. The revenue, expense, and dividend accounts now read zero, ready for next year.
What it is. The report of profitability over a period, built in tiers from sales down to net income.
Intuition. The tiers tell a story: gross profit shows how much the product itself earns after its direct cost; operating income shows what’s left after running the business; net income is what shareholders keep after financing and taxes. Separating them lets a reader see where profit is made or lost — a great gross margin wrecked by bloated overhead reads very differently from a thin-margin product.
| Revenue | 1,000 |
| Cost of goods sold | (400) |
| Gross profit | 600 |
| Operating expenses | (300) |
| Operating income (EBIT) | 300 |
| Interest | (40) |
| Taxes (25%) | (65) |
| Net income | 195 |
Worked example. A company sells $600,000 of phones that cost $200,000, giving $400,000 of gross profit. It then carries $187,500 of depreciation and $500,000 of insurance as operating expenses, and $45,000 of interest below the line. Operating income is $400,000 − $687,500 = a $287,500 operating loss; after interest it’s a $332,500 net loss. The tiers show the product was profitable but the period’s fixed and financing costs swamped it.
What it is. The point-in-time snapshot, with assets and liabilities split into current (within one year or the operating cycle) and non-current.
Intuition. The current/non-current split is about timing and liquidity: current assets are cash or things that will become cash soon (receivables, inventory); current liabilities are bills due soon. Comparing the two tells a reader whether the company can cover its near-term obligations. Assets are listed most-liquid first; equity is contributed capital plus accumulated retained earnings.
| Total current assets | 550 |
| PP&E + intangibles | 950 |
| Total assets | 1,500 |
| Total liabilities | 750 |
| Total equity | 750 |
| Liabilities + equity | 1,500 |
Worked example. A company’s balance sheet shows current assets of cash $10,130,000, inventory $3,600,000, and prepaid insurance $500,000; current liabilities of accounts payable $2,300,000 and unearned revenue $1,200,000. Non-current it holds equipment of $1,000,000 less $187,500 of accumulated depreciation. The equity section stacks common stock, additional paid-in capital, and retained earnings. Everything ties because assets equal liabilities plus equity — the equation enforced.
What it is. The real top line after the things that reduce it.
Intuition. Returns, allowances, and early-payment discounts are contra-revenue — they shrink the reported top line rather than appearing as expenses lower down. Reporting net sales keeps the income statement honest: the headline number is what the company actually expects to keep, not the optimistic gross.
Worked example. A retailer rings up $1,000,000 of gross sales. Customers return $40,000 of goods and take $15,000 of early-payment discounts. Net sales are $1,000,000 − $40,000 − $15,000 = $945,000. That $945,000, not the $1,000,000, is the figure that flows into gross profit and every margin calculation.
What it is. You estimate uncollectible accounts in the same period as the sale (matching). The allowance is a contra-asset; receivables minus the allowance equals net realizable value.
Intuition. If you sell on credit, some customers won’t pay — and matching says recognize that cost in the period of the sale, before you know exactly which customers. So you book an estimate (bad debt expense) and park it in an allowance. When a specific account later goes bad, you’ve already expensed it, so the write-off just reduces the allowance and the receivable, with no new hit to income.
Worked example. A company with $1,000,000 of receivables estimates 3% won’t collect, so it books Dr Bad Debt Expense 30,000 / Cr Allowance 30,000, reporting net receivables of $970,000. Three months later a specific $5,000 customer goes bankrupt: Dr Allowance 5,000 / Cr Accounts Receivable 5,000. Net receivables and the allowance both fall, but income is untouched — the expense was already taken when the estimate was made.
What it is. Cost of goods sold is whatever inventory left the shelves during the period.
Intuition. Think of a bucket: you start with some inventory, pour in purchases, and what isn’t still in the bucket at the end must have been sold. Ending inventory is an asset on the balance sheet; the rest is the COGS expense on the income statement. The two are joined — a counting error in one is an equal-and-opposite error in the other.
Worked example. A store starts with $2,000,000 of inventory, buys $1,800,000 more (goods available $3,800,000), and counts $1,600,000 on the shelves at year-end. COGS = $3,800,000 − $1,600,000 = $2,200,000. If a careless count had reported ending inventory as $1,700,000, COGS would drop to $2,100,000 and pretax income would rise $100,000 — purely from the miscount.
What it is. Three ways to decide which costs become COGS and which stay in ending inventory.
Intuition. The physical goods don’t change — only the cost label you attach as they leave. When prices are rising, FIFO sends old (cheap) costs to COGS, so COGS is low and reported income (and tax) is high; LIFO sends new (expensive) costs to COGS, so income and tax are lower. That tax saving is the entire reason a company chooses LIFO in an inflationary environment.
Worked example. A company buys 100 units at $10 then 100 at $14, and sells 100. Under FIFO, COGS uses the $10 units = $1,000, leaving $1,400 of inventory — lower COGS, higher income, higher tax. Under LIFO, COGS uses the $14 units = $1,400, leaving $1,000 of inventory — higher COGS, lower income, and a smaller tax bill. Weighted average splits the difference at $12 a unit. Same 100 units sold, three different profits.
What it is. Write inventory down when its net realizable value falls below cost — conservatism. You can write down, never up.
Intuition. Accounting leans pessimistic: recognize losses as soon as they’re likely, but don’t recognize gains until they’re realized. If inventory has gone stale or the market price has dropped below what you paid, the asset is worth less than its cost, so you book the loss now rather than waiting for the sale.
Worked example. A retailer holds last season’s coats at a cost of $80,000, but they can now be sold for only $50,000 net of selling costs. Net realizable value ($50,000) is below cost ($80,000), so the company writes the inventory down by $30,000, recording a loss and carrying the coats at $50,000. If those coats later become fashionable again, it still cannot write them back above $50,000.
What it is. Capitalize all costs to acquire an asset and get it ready for use; expense ordinary repairs.
Intuition. If a cost creates or extends a long-lived benefit, it belongs on the balance sheet as part of the asset and is then matched to future periods through depreciation. If it just keeps the asset running this period (an oil change, a paint touch-up), it’s an expense now. The dividing line is whether the spending buys future years or just this one.
Worked example. A company buys a $900,000 machine, pays $60,000 to ship it and $40,000 to install and test it. All three are capitalized — the asset goes on the books at $1,000,000, because freight and installation were necessary to make it usable. Two years later it spends $5,000 to replace a worn belt; that’s routine maintenance, expensed immediately, not added to the machine.
What it is. Three ways to spread an asset’s cost over its useful life.
Intuition. All three move the same total cost off the balance sheet over the asset’s life — they just differ on timing. Straight-line is even. Units-of-production ties the expense to actual use. Double-declining is accelerated, front-loading the expense to match assets that lose most value early. Because depreciation is non-cash, the method changes reported income but not cash — except indirectly through taxes.
Worked example. A machine costs $96,000, salvage $6,000, four-year life, 120,000 total units, with 43,000 units made in year 1. Straight-line gives $90,000 ÷ 4 = $22,500. Units gives ($90,000 ÷ 120,000) × 43,000 = $32,250. Double-declining gives 2 × 25% × $96,000 = $48,000 — the highest year-one expense, hence the lowest year-one income. By the end of four years all three have expensed the same $90,000.
What it is. Remove the asset’s cost and its accumulated depreciation, then compare cash proceeds to net book value.
Intuition. An asset leaves the books at what it’s actually worth on paper — its net book value — not its original cost. If someone pays more than that, you booked a gain; less, a loss. The gain or loss is just the correction for depreciation having been too slow or too fast versus reality.
Worked example. Equipment that cost $100,000 has $70,000 of accumulated depreciation, so its net book value is $30,000. Sold for $40,000, the company records a $10,000 gain — the buyer paid more than the depreciated value. Had it sold for $25,000 instead, that’s a $5,000 loss. The journal entry removes the $100,000 cost and $70,000 of accumulated depreciation, records the cash, and plugs the gain or loss.
What it is. Finite-life intangibles (patents, customer lists) are amortized, usually straight-line with no salvage; goodwill and indefinite-life intangibles are not amortized — they’re tested for impairment.
Intuition. Amortization is depreciation for things you can’t touch. A patent has a legal life, so its cost is spread over that life. Goodwill has no defined life — it represents the premium paid for a business above its net assets — so instead of amortizing on a schedule, the company checks each year whether it’s still worth what’s on the books and writes it down only if it isn’t.
Worked example. A company buys a patent for $500,000 with a 10-year remaining life: it records $50,000 of amortization a year. Separately, it acquires a competitor and books $2,000,000 of goodwill. That goodwill sits untouched on the balance sheet year after year — no annual amortization — unless an impairment test shows the acquired business is worth less than expected, at which point goodwill is written down.
What it is. Obligations due within a year: accounts payable, accrued liabilities (wages, interest, taxes payable), unearned revenue, notes payable, and the current portion of long-term debt.
Intuition. Current liabilities are the near-term claims on the company’s cash, so they’re the denominator of every short-term solvency check. They come from three sources: bills for things bought on credit (payables), costs incurred but not yet paid (accruals), and cash collected before delivery (unearned revenue). Watching them against current assets tells you whether the next twelve months are comfortable or tight.
Worked example. A company’s current liabilities include accounts payable of $2,300,000 from inventory bought on account, interest payable of $20,000 accrued on a loan, unearned revenue of $1,200,000 from a customer advance, and a $400,000 slice of a long-term loan that comes due next year. Each arose from a different event, but all four are due within twelve months, so all four sit in the current section.
What it is. A borrowing recorded as a liability, with interest accrued as time passes.
Intuition. Borrowing is a financing event — cash in, a liability up — and nothing hits the income statement yet. Interest is the cost of using the money, so it accrues over time as an expense. When you repay, you’re settling two separate things: the principal (a financing outflow) and any interest still owed.
Worked example. A company repays a $2,000,000 loan plus $50,000 of interest, of which $25,000 had already been accrued last period. The entry settles the principal, clears the old interest payable, and books the new interest: Dr Notes Payable 2,000,000 / Dr Interest Payable 25,000 / Dr Interest Expense 25,000 / Cr Cash 2,050,000. Only the $25,000 of new interest hits this period’s income; the rest is balance-sheet cleanup.
What it is. A bond’s issue price depends on how its coupon compares to the market rate.
Intuition. Investors price a bond at the present value of its cash flows discounted at the rate they could earn elsewhere (the market rate). If the bond pays a coupon above market, it’s more attractive, so buyers pay extra — a premium. If it pays below market, buyers demand a discount to compensate. Premium or discount is always measured against the market rate, not against zero.
Worked example. A company issues a $1,000,000 bond with a 5% coupon. If the market rate is also 5%, it sells for exactly $1,000,000 — par. If the market rate has risen to 6%, the 5% coupon looks stingy, so investors will only pay, say, $960,000 — a discount. If instead the market rate had fallen to 4%, the 5% coupon is generous and the bond sells for, say, $1,040,000 — a premium.
What it is. Cash interest comes off the coupon; interest expense comes off the market rate applied to carrying value.
Intuition. Two different rates are doing two different jobs. The coupon rate determines the fixed cash you actually pay each period. The market rate at issuance determines the true economic cost, applied to what the bond is currently carried at. The gap between the cash paid and the expense recognized is the amortization of the premium or discount, which nudges the carrying value toward face by maturity.
Worked example. A bond issued at a $960,000 discount on $1,000,000 face with a 5% coupon and 6% market rate pays $50,000 cash interest (5% of face) but records $57,600 of interest expense (6% of the $960,000 carrying value). The $7,600 difference is discount amortization, which raises the carrying value from $960,000 toward $1,000,000. Over the bond’s life that gap closes and the carrying value reaches face.
What it is. When stock is issued, the proceeds split: par value goes to Common Stock, the excess to Additional Paid-in Capital.
Intuition. Par value is a tiny legal artifact — often $0.01 or $1 — not the price investors pay. The accounting just splits the cash raised into a nominal “common stock at par” line and an “everything above par” line (APIC). Total contributed capital is the sum of the two; the split itself carries no economic meaning.
Worked example. A company issues 500,000 shares at $20 each with $1 par. It raises $10,000,000 of cash. Of that, 500,000 × $1 = $500,000 goes to common stock, and the remaining $9,500,000 goes to additional paid-in capital: Dr Cash 10,000,000 / Cr Common Stock 500,000 / Cr APIC 9,500,000. Equity rises by the full $10,000,000 — the split is just bookkeeping.
What it is. Shares the company repurchased and is holding (not retiring). Treasury stock is a contra-equity account that reduces total equity at cost and lowers shares outstanding.
Intuition. Buying back your own stock isn’t buying an asset — you can’t own a piece of yourself — so it’s recorded as a reduction of equity. The shares still count as “issued” but no longer “outstanding,” which is why buybacks raise EPS. Critically, there’s no income-statement gain or loss when you buy or resell treasury shares; any difference flows through APIC.
Worked example. A company repurchases 1,000,000 shares for $30,000,000 ($30 each) and holds them: Dr Treasury Stock 30,000,000 / Cr Cash 30,000,000, cutting total equity by $30,000,000. Later it reissues 200,000 of them at $35: it brings in $7,000,000 cash, removes $6,000,000 of treasury stock (200,000 × $30 cost), and credits the $1,000,000 difference to APIC — never to the income statement.
What it is. Retained earnings is cumulative net income minus cumulative dividends — the profit the company has kept.
Intuition. Retained earnings is the running tally of every dollar of profit the company has earned and not paid out. Net income adds to it (via closing), dividends subtract from it. A cash dividend is a two-step affair: declaring it creates a liability (dividends payable), and paying it later releases the cash. Dividends are a distribution of profit, not a cost of earning it — so they never touch the income statement.
Worked example. A company begins the year with $3,525,000 of retained earnings, loses $332,500, and declares and pays a $500,000 cash dividend. Ending RE = $3,525,000 − $332,500 − $500,000 = $2,692,500. The dividend was recorded by debiting retained earnings and crediting cash — reducing equity and cash — with no line anywhere on the income statement.
What it is. Net income (less preferred dividends) divided by the weighted-average common shares outstanding.
Intuition. EPS translates total profit into profit per owner, which is what a shareholder actually cares about. The numerator is the income available to common holders, so preferred dividends come out first. The denominator uses a time-weighted share count because shares issued or bought back mid-year were only outstanding for part of the period — a buyback in December shouldn’t get full-year weight.
Worked example. A company earns $1,000,000 of net income, pays $100,000 of preferred dividends, and had 900,000 shares outstanding for the year. EPS = ($1,000,000 − $100,000) ÷ 900,000 = $1.00. If it had bought back 200,000 shares exactly halfway through the year, the weighted-average count would be roughly 800,000, lifting EPS above $1.00 — fewer shares splitting the same profit.
What it is. Every cash movement sorts into one of three buckets.
Intuition. The three sections answer three different questions: is the business itself generating cash (operating), what is it spending to grow or shrink its asset base (investing), and how is it funding itself (financing)? A healthy company generates cash from operations and uses it to invest; one that funds operations by borrowing or issuing stock looks very different. The three sections always sum to the change in the cash balance.
Worked example. In one year a company generates ($870,000) from operations, spends $1,000,000 buying equipment (investing), and raises $8,000,000 net from issuing stock, borrowing, repaying a loan, and paying dividends (financing). The three sum to a $6,130,000 increase in cash, taking the balance from $4,000,000 to $10,130,000 — which must equal the cash line on the year-end balance sheet.
What it is. Start from net income and convert it back to operating cash.
Intuition. Net income is accrual profit, not cash, so you reverse the accrual effects. Add back non-cash expenses like depreciation (they reduced income but never cost cash). Subtract gains on asset sales (the cash from that sale belongs in investing, not operating). Then adjust for working capital: if receivables or inventory grew, income was recorded that hasn’t turned into cash, so subtract; if payables or unearned revenue grew, you got cash or deferred a payment, so add.
Worked example. A company has net income of $500,000, depreciation of $120,000, accounts receivable up $40,000, and accounts payable up $30,000. Operating cash = $500,000 + $120,000 − $40,000 + $30,000 = $610,000. The $40,000 of new receivables is revenue booked but not yet collected (subtract), while the $30,000 of new payables is expense incurred but not yet paid (add) — each adjustment pulls accrual income toward actual cash.
This is the exam’s biggest question. You get a year of transactions plus the prior balance sheet, and you produce journal entries → adjusting entries → income statement, balance sheet, and cash flow statement. Here is the sample year worked end to end with every number, so you can reproduce the method on any version.
The journal entries.
The year-end adjusting entries. Only two are needed here — the machine’s depreciation and the insurance used up. (Loan f’s interest was already paid in j, so no accrual.)
Income statement. Only transaction (a) earned revenue this year; the advances in (d) stay unearned.
Cash flow statement (indirect). Start from the net loss, add back depreciation, then adjust for every working-capital change. This is where most points are won or lost.
The proof that you did it right: the ending cash from the statement ($10,130,000) equals the beginning cash plus every cash entry above. If those two don’t match, a working-capital sign is flipped.
Machine cost $96,000, salvage $6,000, 4-year life, 120,000 total units. Units produced: 43,000 in year 1, 45,000 in year 2. Depreciable base = $96,000 − $6,000 = $90,000.
The follow-up questions. Lowest EPS = highest depreciation (it depresses net income most). Year 1: DDB at $48,000 is highest → DDB gives the lowest year-1 EPS. Year 2: units-of-production at $33,750 is highest → units gives the lowest year-2 EPS.
You’re given a beginning and ending balance sheet, the year’s depreciation, and capex/acquisitions, then asked to back into the disposal figures. Everything comes from two rollforwards — one for gross cost, one for accumulated depreciation — plus the disposal gain/loss. Memorize these four equations and you can solve any version.
How to attack it. Plug the known figures into the gross and accumulated rollforwards and solve for the one unknown in each. Net book value of PP&E at year-end is just gross minus accumulated from the ending balance sheet. To get the gain or loss, you need proceeds (given in the cash-flow or notes) and the NBV disposed (from the two rollforwards). The PP&E added by the Burlington/Wilhelmshaven acquisitions is the plug in the gross rollforward once capex and disposals are known.
Pull the exact ConocoPhillips numbers from the supporting materials in your project and run them through these five lines — the figures change on the real final, the equations don’t.
This question reads the equity section of a real 10-K. Each part is a short computation — here’s the formula for each, so you can plug in whatever figures appear.
Treasury vs. retired. Read the disclosure: if repurchased shares are held as treasury stock, they sit as a contra-equity line that reduces total equity and are still “issued” but not “outstanding.” If they’re retired, they leave issued shares entirely and the cost is absorbed against common stock, APIC, and retained earnings. Whether a dividend was declared, and how much, comes from the statement of stockholders’ equity or the retained-earnings rollforward.
Not on the Stern final, but standard in IB and PE interviews and modeling — deferred taxes, purchase accounting, stock comp, leases, free cash flow, and the three-statement drills. Same depth as the cards above.
What it is. The most-asked IB accounting question: “if X changes by $Y, walk me through the three statements.” There is one method, and the order is fixed.
Intuition. The statements are linked, so one change ripples through all three. The discipline is the sequence: income statement first because it sets net income; cash flow second because it converts net income to cash; balance sheet last because it absorbs both, and it must balance — that’s your proof you did it right.
Worked example. Depreciation rises $10, tax rate 40%. Income statement: pretax −$10, so net income −$6. Cash flow: start at −$6, add back the $10 of non-cash depreciation → cash +$4. Balance sheet: cash +$4, PP&E −$10 (net assets −$6), retained earnings −$6 — balanced. The +$4 is the tax shield. Now a second flow — write down inventory $10 at the same 40%: net income −$6; CFS −$6 + $10 non-cash write-down → cash +$4; BS cash +$4, inventory −$10, RE −$6. Same shape, different account.
What it is. Book income (GAAP) and taxable income follow different rules, so the tax expense on the income statement differs from the cash taxes actually paid. The gap parks on the balance sheet as a deferred tax liability or asset and reverses over time.
Intuition. The classic driver is depreciation: companies use straight-line for books but accelerated for taxes, so early on taxable income is lower than book income and cash taxes are lower than book tax expense. That under-payment is a liability — a DTL — because in later years tax depreciation falls below book and the company pays it back.
Worked example. A company has $1,000 of book depreciation but $1,500 of tax depreciation in year 1. Taxable income is $500 lower than book, so at a 40% rate it pays $200 less cash tax than its book tax expense. That $200 becomes a deferred tax liability. Over the asset’s life the total depreciation is identical both ways, so the DTL builds early and unwinds later — it’s a timing difference, not a permanent saving.
What it is. When one company buys another, it records the target’s assets and liabilities at fair value; any excess of purchase price over the fair value of net identifiable assets is goodwill.
Intuition. Goodwill is the premium paid for what can’t be put on its own line — brand, workforce, synergies. In the deal the acquirer also marks the target’s assets up to fair value (“write-ups”), which creates extra future depreciation and amortization. Because the tax basis usually doesn’t change with the write-up, that step also creates a deferred tax liability.
Worked example. A PE firm buys a company for $1,000. The target’s identifiable net assets are worth $600 at fair value after writing PP&E up by $100. Goodwill = $1,000 − $600 = $400 — a plug, not a chosen number. The $100 write-up adds future D&A and, since the tax books didn’t get the step-up, creates a DTL of $100 × the tax rate. This is the opening balance sheet of every LBO.
What it is. Equity awards (options, RSUs) paid to employees are a real expense on the income statement, but a non-cash one — so they’re added back on the cash flow statement.
Intuition. The company compensated people with shares, not cash, so GAAP records the expense (lowering net income) while the cash flow statement adds it back (no cash left). The catch is dilution: those new shares raise the share count and reduce value per share, which is the true cost to existing owners. That’s why the “add it back or not” debate is a live one in valuation.
Worked example. A tech company reports $500 of net income after a $200 stock-comp expense. On the cash flow statement, that $200 is added back, so operating cash is $200 higher than net income suggests. But the company issued $200 of shares, diluting existing holders — so a careful analyst treats SBC as a genuine cost even though it never touched cash.
What it is. Under ASC 842 most leases go on the balance sheet as a right-of-use (ROU) asset and a lease liability. A finance lease (you effectively own it) front-loads expense as amortization + interest; an operating lease shows a single straight-line expense.
Intuition. A multi-year lease is really a financed purchase, so the standard puts both sides on the balance sheet — an asset for the right to use, a liability for the future payments. The finance-vs-operating split decides whether the expense is front-loaded and how the cash shows up (operating vs financing on the cash flow statement). For leverage analysis, the lease liability is debt-like.
Worked example. A retailer signs a 10-year store lease whose payments are worth $5,000 in present value. It books a $5,000 ROU asset and a $5,000 lease liability. As an operating lease, the income statement shows one straight-line rent expense each year. As a finance lease, it shows amortization of the asset plus interest on the liability — higher in the early years, lower later — even though the cash paid is the same.
What it is. The cash a business actually generates after the spending needed to run and grow it. Two versions, for two different purposes.
Intuition. Net income is an accounting number; free cash flow is the cash that’s truly free to return to investors or pay down debt. Unlevered FCF ignores capital structure — it’s the cash to all capital providers, so it’s what a DCF discounts to get enterprise value. Levered FCF is what’s left for equity after lenders are paid, so it drives LBO equity returns.
Worked example. A company has EBIT of $1,000, a 25% tax rate, D&A of $200, capex of $300, and a $50 increase in working capital. Unlevered FCF = $1,000 × 0.75 + $200 − $300 − $50 = $750 + $200 − $300 − $50 = $600. That $600 is what the DCF discounts. In an LBO you’d keep going — subtract interest and required debt paydown — to land on the cash available to equity.
What it is. Working capital is current assets minus current liabilities; the cash conversion cycle measures how many days cash is tied up between paying suppliers and collecting from customers.
Intuition. Every day inventory sits or a customer hasn’t paid is cash locked up; every day you delay paying suppliers is cash you keep using. A short — or negative — cycle funds growth internally. An increase in working capital uses cash; a decrease frees it, which is exactly why ΔNWC sits in both the cash flow statement and free cash flow.
Worked example. A company collects in 40 days (DSO), holds inventory 60 days (DIO), and pays suppliers in 30 days (DPO): its cash conversion cycle is 40 + 60 − 30 = 70 days — cash is tied up 70 days per cycle. A subscription business that collects up front and pays vendors later can run a negative cycle, meaning its customers finance its operations — a genuine strength, not a red flag.
What it is. When a parent owns more than 50% of a subsidiary it consolidates 100% of the sub’s financials, then shows the slice it doesn’t own as noncontrolling interest within equity.
Intuition. Consolidation is driven by control, not by the exact ownership percentage. If you control a subsidiary, you put all of its revenue and assets on your statements — then subtract the part that belongs to outside shareholders so your bottom line and equity reflect only your share. In valuation, NCI is added in enterprise value because EV captures the whole consolidated entity.
Worked example. A parent owns 80% of a subsidiary that earns $100 of net income. It consolidates all $100, then subtracts $20 (the 20% it doesn’t own) as “net income attributable to noncontrolling interest,” leaving $80 attributable to the parent. On the balance sheet, that 20% outside stake sits as NCI inside equity, and in an EV bridge the NCI is added like debt.
The ratio layer from the Red Book — how analysts read the statements. Profitability, liquidity, returns, efficiency, and credit.
What it is. The income statement steps down through tiers of “earnings,” each stripping out more. EBITDA = Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation & Amortization.
Intuition. Each rung answers a different question. EBITDA approximates operating cash generation before capital structure (interest), tax regime, and non-cash D&A — so it lets you compare companies with different debt loads and asset bases, which is why it anchors EV/EBITDA multiples. But it ignores capex and working capital, so it is not true cash flow.
Worked example. A company has $1,000 revenue, $400 COGS, $200 SG&A: gross profit $600, EBITDA $400. With $100 of D&A, EBIT is $300; after $50 interest and a 25% tax, net income is ($300 − $50) × 0.75 = $187.50. A second company with the same $400 EBITDA but heavy debt or an asset-heavy base could post far lower net income — EBITDA hides that, which is the point and the danger.
What it is. Each earnings tier divided by revenue, as a percentage.
Intuition. Margins normalize profit by size, so you can compare a $10B company to a $100M one and track a single company over time. Gross margin shows pricing power and product economics; EBITDA and operating margin show operating efficiency; net margin folds in financing and taxes. Falling margins flag cost pressure or eroding pricing.
Worked example. A company with $1,000 revenue, $600 gross profit, $400 EBITDA, $300 EBIT, and $187 net income runs a 60% gross, 40% EBITDA, 30% operating, and 18.7% net margin. A competitor at the same revenue but a 50% gross margin is either pricing lower or paying more for inputs — that 10-point gap is the whole story of who has the better business.
What it is. Short-term solvency — can the company cover its near-term bills?
Intuition. The current ratio asks whether current assets cover current liabilities; the quick (acid-test) ratio strips out inventory because it’s the slowest current asset to become cash and may not sell at full value. Above 1.0 is generally comfortable, but a very high ratio can mean idle cash or bloated, slow-moving inventory.
Worked example. A company has $300 of current assets ($120 of it inventory) against $200 of current liabilities. Current ratio = 300 ÷ 200 = 1.5x; quick ratio = (300 − 120) ÷ 200 = 0.9x. The gap says a chunk of its liquidity is locked in inventory — fine for a fast-turning retailer, riskier if that inventory is stale.
What it is. How much profit the company earns per dollar of capital.
Intuition. ROA measures how well the company uses all its assets; ROE measures the return to equity holders, which leverage inflates (more debt shrinks the equity denominator). DuPont decomposes ROE so you can see whether high returns come from margins, asset efficiency, or just borrowing. ROIC strips out capital structure to judge the underlying business — the cleanest return metric, and the one compared against WACC to see if value is created.
Worked example. A company with a 10% ROA and a 50/50 debt-to-equity mix (assets = 2× equity) has ROE = 10% × 2 = 20%. The extra ten points come entirely from leverage, not a better business — DuPont makes that visible. Two firms with identical 20% ROE can be opposites: one earns it through margins, the other through debt.
What it is. How fast the company converts assets into sales and cash.
Intuition. Turnover ratios measure operational efficiency — higher inventory and receivables turnover mean cash isn’t sitting idle. Converting each to days (DSO, DIO, DPO) gives the cash conversion cycle. A grocer turns inventory fast (fresh goods move); a jeweler’s turns slowly (expensive items sit). The level is only meaningful against peers and trend.
Worked example. A company with $1,000 of COGS and $200 of average inventory turns inventory 5x, or DIO = 365 ÷ 5 = 73 days — inventory sits about 73 days before selling. A peer turning 10x (37 days) runs leaner and frees more cash, all else equal. That difference compounds into the cash conversion cycle and free cash flow.
What it is. How much debt a company carries and whether its cash flow can service it — the lens of lenders and LBO sponsors.
Intuition. Leverage ratios size the debt against earnings; coverage ratios test whether earnings cover the fixed payments. A lender cares less about absolute debt than about Debt/EBITDA (how many years of earnings to repay) and whether cash flow comfortably covers interest. These ratios set how much debt an LBO can carry and trigger covenants if they slip.
Worked example. A company with $400 of debt and $100 of EBITDA is levered 4.0x. With $80 of EBIT against $25 of interest, interest coverage is 3.2x — earnings cover interest more than three times. If a downturn cut EBIT to $30, coverage collapses to 1.2x and the company is suddenly fragile. Probing that sensitivity is exactly what credit analysis does.
The Red Book’s advanced section — normalization, tax rates, write-downs, intercompany investments, and the debt nuances that show up in restructuring and LBOs.
What it is. One-time items — restructuring charges, litigation, asset write-downs, gains on sales — are stripped out to show the recurring earnings power of the business.
Intuition. A buyer values what the business will keep earning, not a year distorted by a one-off. So you normalize: add back genuinely one-time costs, remove one-time gains, to get adjusted EBITDA or normalized net income. The judgment is what’s truly non-recurring — aggressive add-backs that relabel recurring costs as “one-time” inflate earnings, which is why sponsors scrutinize the quality-of-earnings adjustments.
Worked example. A company reports $300 of operating income that includes a $40 one-time legal settlement and a $20 gain from selling a building. Normalized operating income adds back the $40 (a real one-off cost) and removes the $20 (a non-operating gain): $300 + $40 − $20 = $320. That $320 run-rate, not the reported $300, is what a valuation should capitalize.
What it is. The marginal rate is the statutory rate on the next dollar of income; the effective rate is the actual tax expense divided by pre-tax income.
Intuition. The two differ because of permanent differences (tax credits, tax-exempt income, foreign rates) and timing. In a DCF you typically project future taxes at the marginal rate, since that’s what applies going forward; the effective rate reflects the historical reality, including one-off benefits that may not repeat.
Worked example. A company has $1,000 of pre-tax income and a 21% statutory rate, but reports only $180 of tax thanks to lower-taxed foreign income and credits. Its effective rate is 180 ÷ 1,000 = 18%. Forecasting forward, you’d likely model a marginal rate near 21–25% rather than assume the 18% one-off benefits persist every year.
What it is. A write-down reduces an asset’s carrying value to a lower fair value; a write-off removes it entirely (to zero).
Intuition. Both recognize that an asset is worth less than the books say — conservatism. A write-down is partial (inventory marked to a lower NRV, goodwill impaired); a write-off is total (a worthless receivable, a fully impaired asset). Either way it’s a non-cash charge that hits the income statement and reduces the asset, and on the cash flow statement it’s added back like depreciation.
Worked example. A company holds $100 of inventory now worth $60 — it writes it down $40, recording a $40 non-cash loss and carrying the inventory at $60. Separately a $10 receivable becomes uncollectible and is written off entirely, removing the asset. On the cash flow statement both are added back to net income because no cash left; the only cash effect is a smaller future tax bill.
What it is. How a company accounts for a stake in another depends on its level of influence.
Intuition. The accounting scales with control. A passive minority stake is just an investment marked to market. With significant influence you pick up your share of the investee’s earnings (equity method). With control you fold the whole entity onto your statements and back out what you don’t own as noncontrolling interest. The thresholds key off influence over voting interest, not a hard ownership line.
Worked example. A company owns 30% of another that earns $100 and pays $20 of dividends. Under the equity method it records $30 of equity-method income (its 30% share) and reduces the investment by its $6 share of dividends — it does not consolidate the investee’s revenue. Had it owned 80%, it would instead consolidate all $100 and show $20 as NCI.
What it is. “Payment-in-kind” interest is paid not in cash but by adding to the debt principal — it accrues to the loan balance instead of being paid out.
Intuition. PIK lets a borrower preserve cash by rolling interest into principal, so the debt grows over time. It’s common in LBOs and distressed structures where cash is tight. Because no cash leaves, PIK interest is a non-cash expense — it lowers net income but is added back on the cash flow statement, while the debt balance climbs. A “PIK toggle” note lets the borrower choose cash or PIK each period.
Worked example. A company incurs $100 of PIK interest at a 30% tax rate. Income statement: pre-tax −$100, net income −$70. Cash flow: start at −$70, add back the $100 non-cash PIK → cash +$30 (the tax shield). Balance sheet: cash +$30, debt +$100 (the PIK accrues to principal), retained earnings −$70 — and it balances. No cash interest was paid; the loan just got bigger.
What it is. Three debt and balance-sheet nuances. OID (original issue discount): debt sold below face; the discount amortizes as extra interest. Restricted cash: cash set aside for a specific purpose (collateral, escrow), not freely available. Trapped cash: cash held in a foreign subsidiary that would be taxed if repatriated.
Intuition. OID is the bond-discount idea — issue below par, accrete to par — applied to loans; the discount is effectively prepaid interest the lender earns, lifting the effective yield above the coupon. Restricted and trapped cash both sit in the cash line but aren’t usable, so analysts exclude them from net-debt and liquidity math — counting them overstates available cash.
Worked example. A company issues $1,000 of face debt for $950 — the $50 OID amortizes over the life as additional non-cash interest, raising the effective rate above the coupon. Of its $200 cash balance, $30 is escrowed as loan collateral (restricted) and $50 sits in a foreign sub (trapped). For net-debt purposes, only the $120 of free cash should net against debt.
An adaptive self-quiz you can open any day. It pulls from what you've been working — technical, behavioral, Excel, and calculation — and weights toward what you've checked off, plus anything you missed last time. Open it on a Sunday or any day you skipped one; nothing is lost. Miss a question and it comes back.
Your space for everything from Eastdil and Project Destined — paste notes and upload files here so you stop re-deploying the app every Monday. The Excel grader at the bottom marks a model you upload.